Friday, September 10, 2010
teesta setalvad leads a charmed life: she can get away with toying with the judiciary
gupta on Indian mathematics
From: <v
the whiskey effect on the han: some home truths said. 'peaceful rise' my foot
From: B
People's Daily Online, September 10, 2010
http://www.peopleforum.cn/viewthread.php?tid=36693&extra=page%3D1
Sha Zukang, China's rep at the U.N., gets drunk, but talks sense?
"I know you never liked me Mr. Secretary-General -- well, I never liked you, either... I didn't want to come to New York. It was the last thing I wanted to do. But I've come to love the U.N. and I'm coming to admire some things about you..."
—Sha Zukang, U.N. undersecretary general for Economic and Social Affairs
Allegedly said after having one too many drinks at a U.N. retreat in the Alpine resort town of Alpbach. Sha stood up to make a toast, and then launched into a long rant against the U.N., the United States and U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon. Other officials apparently tried to coax him into putting down the microphone, but it didn't work. Said one U.N. official, "It was a tribute gone awry... It went on for about ten or fifteen minutes but it felt like an hour." Oops! Incidentally, Sha Zukang has been described as the "John Bolton" of China.
FP Exclusive: China's John Bolton
Posted By Colum Lynch Wednesday, September 8, 2010 - 6:46 PM
Sha Zukang, the U.N. undersecretary general for Economic and Social Affairs and the organization's most senior Chinese official, offered U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon a toast last week at a retreat in the Alpine resort town Alpbach that degenerated into an intoxicated rant against the United Nations, the United States, and his boss, Turtle Bay has learned.
"I know you never liked me Mr. Secretary-General -- well, I never liked you, either," Sha told Ban at a dinner attended by the U.N.'s top brass, according to a senior U.N. official who attended the event. "I didn't want to come to New York. It was the last thing I wanted to do. But I've come to love the U.N. and I'm coming to admire some things about you."
The blunt dinner remarks -- which came after Sha had a few drinks -- prompted U.N. officials to approach Sha and try to coax him into putting down the microphone, according to a U.N. spokesman and several U.N. sources who were there. It didn't work. Sha continued a lengthy speech, in which he also expressed his antipathy toward the United States. "It was a tribute gone awry," said a second senior U.N. official who was at the dinner. "It went on for about ten or fifteen minutes but it felt like an hour." Ban was described as having smiled and nodded awkwardly during the Sha rant, but he allowed the dinner to continue.
U.N. officials said that Sha realized that he had gone too far, and that he spent much of the following day out of sight. "Sha Zukang was deeply apologetic when he met the Secretary General in person early the following morning at his own request," said Farhan Haq, the acting deputy U.N. spokesman, in a statement to Turtle Bay. "He said that he had risen to speak the previous evening because he felt that recent criticisms of the Secretary General had been unfair and that he wanted to set the record straight. However, Sha told the Secretary General that he realized that the way that he spoke, coming as it did after he had had a few drinks, was inappropriate, as it went too far. He was also aware that his statements had embarrassed and irritated other senior advisors."
Sha did not respond to a request for comment made through his office.
The incident is likely prove to be highly embarrassing for China, which put forward Sha's name in 2007 for the top U.N. post of U.N. undersecretary general for Economic and Social Affairs. China had also played a central role in promoting Ban's selection as secretary-general, and is expected to back him for a second term. Chinese diplomats have privately defended Ban's stewardship of the organization, citing criticism of Ban as unfair.
But the episode can hardly prove helpful to Ban, whose leadership has come under fire from a number of departing top officials, including Inga-Britt Ahlenius, the former Swedish chief of the U.N.'s internal oversight division.
Sha has long had a reputation as a pugnacious diplomat, a Chinese nationalist with a high-pitched voice and a short temper. A diplomatic colleague, Wang Guangya, China's former U.N. ambassador, described Sha to me as the "John Bolton of the Chinese foreign ministry." In a 2006 interview with the BBC, Sha told the United States to "shut up" about China's military buildup.
Sha, 62, began his career in the Chinese foreign service about four decades ago, as a young Chinese diplomat who had escaped the student purges of the cultural revolution, landing a plum assignment in 1960s London. He rose to the top ranks of a foreign ministry that has become increasingly assertive in recent years, serving in Colombo, Sri Lanka, New Delhi, India, and Geneva, Switzerland. He has also served as a head of China's department of arms control, in the Chinese foreign ministry.
Few Chinese officials have been more combative in public than Sha. In that same 2006 interview with the BBC, Sha offered a highly emotional defense of China's military, economic and diplomatic rise. Sha warned that China would not budge on its claim to Taiwan and that it would use military force to defend China's interest. "No force in the world can shake Chinese nations' determination to achieve unification of my great motherland," he said. "For China one inch of the territory is more valuable than the life of our people; we will never concede on that."
Questioned about former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld's expressions of concern about China's military buildup, Sha responded: "It is better for [the] U.S. to shut up, keep quiet. China's military build up is not threatening anyone...we are not fighting anywhere, we are not killing the innocent people anywhere in the world today. But look what they are doing today. So we have to be careful, careful to make sure no one in the world can harm China."
Sha was hired by the United Nations in July 2007, making him the top Chinese official in the U.N. Secretariat. Sha has a reputation as a sometimes charming, smart, and humorous personality, but one with a volatile streak. Frustrated that attendees at a U.N. conference last year refused to take their seats, the exasperated official raised his hands in the air, repeatedly beat his gavel, and angrily announced: "This is really unique; now I'm deeply impressed by this uniqueness. And it is so unique that many of you have to sit and many of you have to stand behind making noises," he complained. "I know...I'm offending everyone, which I do not care at all."
The trouble at Alpbach began when U.N. officials arranged for a cocktail reception for senior officials. The organizers asked the U.N.'s senior male officials to mix drinks for their female counterparts, as a symbol of the greater number of top women in the traditionally male dominated organization. Ban acted as one of the main bartenders.
Following the reception and a dinner, top U.N. officials were offered an opportunity to make some remarks. Sha took the microphone and that said that while the "wine affected me a little...I want to say something that's on my mind," recalled a senior U.N. official.
Sha said that while he had not initially liked Ban or the U.N. all that much, noting that he had been forced to take his job, he had grown to respect him. He said that he appreciated Ban's persistence, his hard work ethic, and his stubbornness. But he also reflected the tense nature of their relationship. "You've been trying to get rid of me. You can fire me anytime, you can fire me today," he said, according to the senior U.N. official.
Sha's colleagues, including Catherine Bragg, a humanitarian relief official, tried to approach Sha to persuade him to calm down. But Sha continued. At one stage, Sha singled out a senior U.N. official, Bob Orr of the United States, and said "I really don't like him: he's an American and I really don't like Americans," according to the senior official. But he then went on to credit Orr for delivering a commendable speech at the U.N. conference on climate change in Copenhagen, in which Orr praised Ban for taking a courageous stand and laying the groundwork for progress on global warming. "He was right," Sha said, according to the official.
"The Power of Truth Will Triumph Over the Gun": Dalai Lama in kerala
From: Friends of Tibet <support@friendsoftibet.org>
Date: Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 1:34 AM
Subject: [FoT] "The Power of Truth Will Triumph Over the Gun": Dalai Lama
To:
"The Power of Truth Will Triumph Over the Gun"
His Holiness the XIV Dalai Lama of Tibet talks to Friends of Tibet (Kerala) members and supporters at The Gateway Hotel of Taj, Kochi on September 04, 2010 at a private audience. (Photos: Kumar Studios) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Kochi: When one of Kerala's well-known cartoonist Yesudasan placed a thalappavu (headgear) on the Dalai Lama, the Tibetan religious leader smiled, and said, "I received a similar one two days ago in Bylakuppe (Karnataka). I will soon have a collection. Thank you very much." The Dalai Lama came to Kochi yesterday for his first-ever visit to the coastal city. In his opening engagement, he met with an audience of about a hundred people, comprising academicians, intellectuals, journalists, politicians, and cultural figures at the Gateway Hotel, at a meeting organised by the 'Friends of Tibet'. The Dalai Lama was clad in his familiar maroon tunic and yellow shawl and looked a decade younger than the 75 he actually is. Thereafter, he proceeded to give a remarkable 40-minute talk on the history and background of the Tibet struggle.
PK Mohankumar (COO, Gateway Hotels), T Damu (Vice President, Taj Hotels), Appu John, Jose VJ and Eldtho Mathew of Friends of Tibet welcome His Holiness the XIV Dalai Lama at The Gateway Hotel, Marine Drive, Ernakulam on September 04, 2010.
Sethu Das, President of Friends of Tibet welcomes His Holiness the XIV Dalai Lama on September 04, 2010.
His Holiness the XIV Dalai Lama is being welcomed at the Anchor Hall of The Gateway Hotel, Marine Drive, Ernakulam on September 04, 2010 for a private audience organised by Friends of Tibet. "Since 1959 the basic policy of the Chinese has remained the same," he said. "The suppression and destruction of Tibetan culture. But our spirit remains strong. We believe in non-violence and compassion." But his impish humour, which was on display throughout the speech, came to the fore. "But that does not mean that the Tibetans don't fight with each other, but they are in a minority," he said. Later, the Dalai Lama added, "Some people regard me as a living Buddha. But in China, they regard me as a living demon." He bursts out laughing at this point. But His Holiness looked worried when he spoke about the ecological destruction of the Tibetan Plateau, the third 'pole' after the North and South Poles. "Thanks to the endless cutting of trees, global warming is much faster now," he says. All the major rivers, like the Brahmaputra and the Indus river, originate in the plateau. "A billion people in many countries in Asia, including India, who depend on these rivers will be affected," he said.
Cartoonist Yesudasan presents a 'Kerala Thalappavu' (headgear) to His Holiness the XIV Dalai Lama of Tibet during a Friends of Tibet private audience at The Gateway Hotel of Taj, Kochi on September 04, 2010.
Prof KS Radhakrishnan (Former Vice Chancellor of Kalady Sanskrit University) welcomes His Holiness the XIV Dalai Lama to Kochi city. But the Dalai Lama's message, ultimately, was one of hope. "The power of the gun is decisive in the short run," he said. "But to implement it, you need many people. For the power of the truth to succeed, you need only one person." He gave the example of Mahatma Gandhi and how he triumphed over the might of the British Empire. "I am convinced that the power of truth will win, one day, in Tibet," he said. The Dalai Lama said that when the Berlin Wall fell and the Soviet Empire disintegrated, nobody could have predicted these events. "This can happen in China also," he said. Incidentally, more than 1.2 million Tibetans have been killed so far, and thousands remain in prison in Tibet. The Dalai Lama said that he had met many young Chinese students who told him that they had been brainwashed by the distorted propaganda about Tibet meted out by the Communist party. "When they went to Tibet, they were amazed to see the goodness of the Tibetan people," he told the spell-bound audience at Kochi. "As more and more Chinese students study abroad and meet young Tibetans, they will understand us better and bring about a change in our country."
Friends of Tibet (Kerala) members and supporters during a private audience with His Holiness the XIV Dalai Lama on September 04, 2010.
|
. . . . . . .
Friends of Tibet, PO Box: 16674, Bombay 400050, India.
. . . . . . .
. . . . . . .
_______
friendsoftibet mailing list
friendsoftibet@lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/friendsoftibet
Voice of India Features Newsletter - 05 September 2010
From: VOI Features <voi.features@vhs-net.com>
Date: Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 10:01 PM
Subject: Voice of India Features Newsletter - 05 September 2010
To:
| |||||||||||||||
bharat gupt/delhi: My Lecture Caste, Love and Honor Killings Habitat Sept 13 , 2010
From: Bharat Gupt <bharatgupt@vsnl.com>
Date: Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 6:42 AM
Subject: My Lecture Caste, Love and Honor Killings Habitat Sept 13 , 2010
To:
Cc:
Associate Professor, Delhi University,
Founder member and Trustee
International Forum for India's Heritage.
PO Box 8518, Ashok Vihar, Delhi 110052 INDIA.
mobile: +91-98100 77914
home phones: +91-11-2724-1490, +91-129-404-4590
email: bharatgupt@vsnl.com
homepage: www.bharatgupt.net
Habitat Center
Lodi Road, New Delhi
Caste, Love & Honour Killings:
Religion or Vote Politics?
By
Prof Bharat Gupt
Monday, 13 Sept 2010
Gulmohar Hall 6:30 pm
Chair:
Shri Ram Madhav
Recently honour killings under the guise of gotra and caste demands have caused serious concern for
freedom of the young to choose their partners.
Prof Bharat Gupt will refer to classical texts revealing the liberalism and diversity of ancient Indian society which can be an inspiration for modern solutions.
Shri Ram Madhav shall lead a discussion with the audience.
ENTRY AND PARKING AT GATE NO. 3
ALL ARE CORDIALLY INVITED
*****************************************************************************************************************************
why only one prince retains his privy purse
From: Bharata Bharati
Madras Day: Amir Abdul Ali discovers a secularist among his forefathers – Ram Narayan
Love intent on nostalgia, peace demurs
From: K
Date: Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 7:20 PM
Subject: Love intent on nostalgia, peace demurs
To:
| http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/undergod/2010/09/by_elizabeth_tenety_its_easy.html |
Thursday, September 09, 2010
Indo-Pak love fest at US Open
"
BANGALORE: Rohan Bopanna and Aisam-ul-Haq Qureshi, tennis world’s Indo-Pak Express, stormed into the US Open men’s doubles final early on Thursday, downing Argentina’s Eduardo Schwank and Horacio Zaballos 7-6 (7-5), 6-4 in the semifinals, before scores of Indians and Pakistanis who cheered in one voice. ‘Indo-Pak’ has never sounded sweeter.
The 16th-seed combination, who played their maiden Grand Slam semifinal before an audience that included the United Nations ambassadors of India and Pakistan, Hardeep Puri and Abdullah H Haroon, will take on the top-seeded American pair of Bob and Mike Bryan in the title round late on Friday.
"I see Qureshi from Lahore and Bopanna from Bangalore combining like brothers," sports minister MS Gill told TOI. "I have one question for everyone. If Bopanna and Qureshi can play together, why cannot India and Pakistan."
Enough already with the nauseating Indo-Pak love fest.
This is the same idiot Sports minister who didn't recognize
Pullela Gopichand, only the 2nd Indian to win the All England Open Badminton championship.
Incidentally, this bozo also used to be India's Chief Election Commissioner - joined the Con-gress immediately after retirement and was rewarded for his service with a Cabinet post, i.e. the Sports Ministry.
No wonder India only participates in sporting events for "participation", not winning.
An aspiration to win would be
un-Secular, un-Nehruvian, un-Socialistic. Why, it would almost be "communal"!!!
I wish this Indo-Pak pair loses in the U.S Open, if only because I want to see a quick end to the suicidal Indo-Pak love fest, before some moron like I.K Gujral proposes a joint Indo-Pak
team for the next Cricket World Cup.
Perhaps Azharuddin & Ayesha( Sangeeta Bijliani) could be brand ambassadors for such a team!
{Or the Old Nawab of Pataudi and the other Ayesha (Sharmila Tagore). That horny old goat has been credited with fathering a long lineage of Lust, sorry "Love" Jihadis. So, perhaps the old goat is a better candidate by virtue of his Luv Jihad credentials? But, I digress...}
It would be very appropriate too, because I gather from the latest buzz about them in the Indian tabloid media that the tainted cricketer was getting ready to pronounce triple Talaq
on Ayesha and introduce yet another infidel Hindu girl to the
religion of Peace (TM)
| Reactions: |
amazing: Muslims and Atheists in Iran burn Qur'an -- You Tube Video
From: sri
Subject: MUST SEE Muslims and Atheists in Iran burn Qur'an -- You Tube Video
To:
From: "BILROJ@aol.com" <BILROJ@aol.com>
To: BILROJ@aol.com
Sent: Thu, September 9, 2010 4:10:38 PM
Subject: MUST SEE Muslims and Atheists in Iran burn Qur'an -- You Tube Video
www.fireonquran.com
churchill's secret war: the rape of india during world war ii
- Publication Date: August 10, 2010 Churchill’s Secret War The British Empire and the Ravaging of India During World War II By Madhusree Mukerjee
- “[W]ell-researched…This gripping account of historical tragedy is a useful corrective to fashionable theories of benign imperial rule, arguing that a brutal rapaciousness was the very soul of the Raj.” —Publishers Weekly
- “An important though uncomfortable lesson for readers who think they know the heroes and villains of World War II.” —Kirkus
- * * * Winston Churchill—protector of the British Empire, loyal ally to the United States…and brutal war criminal? History often turns a blind eye to the most calamitous events, hiding heinous deeds under the guise of brilliant genius or bravery. However, once we are no longer obstructed by bias or hindsight, the ugly truth of even our most beloved historical figures is illuminated.
- In Churchill’s Secret War: The British Empire and the Ravaging of India During World War II (Basic Books; August 10, 2010) Madhusree Mukerjee offers a meticulously researched account of Churchill’s questionable decisions and destructive actions that led to the death of some three million Indians during WWII. While previous accounts of the war have overlooked the famine in the Indian province of Bengal, Mukerjee sheds light on the avoidable devastation that was justified as a means to defeat the Axis powers and maintain colonial control over India. When the United Kingdom entered the Second World War in September 1939, so did India as its longtime colonial claim. A common imperialistic theme, the British envisioned their rule abroad in South Asia as benefiting an inferior civilization.
- Such entrenched condescension certainly shaped Winston Churchill’s perception of India and its people. Harboring intense racist sentiments, Churchill exclaimed to a close advisor in 1943, “I hate Indians. They are beastly people with a beastly religion.” Words aside, Churchill’s actions more than illustrated his disregard for Indian lives, as he in effect caused the death of millions by callously refusing them shipments of wheat and rice.
- Due to myriad factors associated with the United Kingdom’s – and Churchill’s – wartime aspirations, adequate provisions were withheld from India in the summer and fall of 1943. While all of the contributing forces cannot be identified, Mukerjee asserts three main explanations for the UK’s inaction: · However excessive, British officials were determined to accrue 27 million tons of civilian imports for the UK during 1943. Churchill had an aversion to austerity when it came to his people, so he did not want to impose restraints on the quantity and variety of food available. He also built up the supply of provisions to protect against inevitable post-war economic shocks. ·
- Churchill was also committed to maintaining a stockpile of food for the Balkans. These reserves were meant to feed the Greeks and Yugoslavs that the UK intended to liberate, so shiploads of wheat from Australia passed by famine-stricken India en route for storage.
- · Ego. Churchill wanted to avoid the embarrassment of admitting to American officials that he controlled enough resources, in terms of ships and grain, to relieve a colony imperiled by hunger. Had adequate relief been sent, Mukerjee writes, it “would have proved to Americans what they had suspected all along: the British had extracted a lot more shipping than they really needed.” Regardless of the specific rationale, it is certain that some three million people died in a man-made famine.
- In addition to outlining why the famine broke out, Mukerjee also provides a broader overview of India’s internal divisions along primarily religious lines, while situating the famine in the larger context of India’s fight for independence. Churchill sought to exacerbate the rift between the country’s Hindu and Muslim populations in an effort to divide and conquer, but the discord (heightened by the turmoil of war – particularly the famine) eventually led to violence that expedited the UK’s disengagement with India.
- While independence was won following bloodshed, Hindu leader Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi had previously endeavored to end British rule peacefully through the Quit India campaign. On the other side, Muhammad Ali Jinnah of the Muslim League sought to establish an autonomous nation for India’s minority Muslim population – Pakistan – and achieved that end in 1947.
- As Mukerjee writes, “So it was that WWII sowed the seeds both for the independence of India and for its division.” Considering the human toll of the Bengal famine and the impact that it had on India’s post-war composition, it is hard to believe that it has until now been largely overlooked by history. More shocking still is the exposure of Winston Churchill’s complicity in the death of so many Indian people. A humane and richly detailed account of this gruesome chapter in India’s history, CHURCHILL’S SECRET WAR is essential reading for anyone seeking to uncover one of history’s buried truths.
- # # # ABOUT THE AUTHOR Madhusree Mukerjee won a Guggenheim fellowship to write her previous book, The Land of Naked People. She has served on the board of editors of Scientific American. She lives near Frankfurt, Germany.
- ABOUT THE BOOK CHURCHILL’S SECRET WAR The British Empire and the Ravaging of India During World War II By Madhusree Mukerjee Published by Basic Books Publication date: August 10, 2010 ISBN: 9780465002016 $28.95 / $34.50 (Can.)
- For additional information about CHURCHILL’S SECRET WAR and other Basic Books,visit us on the web at www.basicbooks.com. Contact: Nick Davies, 212-340-8163 / nick.davies@perseusbooks.com
now for something light-hearted, about cows and companies
| |
| |||||
| ||||||
| ||||||
| ||||||
| ||||||
| ||||||
| ||||||
| ||||||
| ||||||
| ||||||
| ||||||
| ||||||
| ||||||










Lt. Col. (Retd.) Mahendra Mathur
Dr. Saradindu Mukherji